Quick Post

Oh, no! It's using facts and reason.... (funny)

New Topic
Oh, no! It's using facts and reason.... (funny)
  • I just hafta share this with ya'll.  Cracked me up this mornin.
     
    Oh, No! It's Making Well-Reasoned Arguments Backed With Facts! Run!
    By Matthew Barnes
    May 28, 2009 | Issue 45•22

    I…I think it's finally over. Our reactionary emotional response seems
    to have stopped it dead in its tracks. If I'm right, all we have to do
    now is smugly reiterate our half-formed thesis and—oh, no! For the
    love of God, no! It's thoughtfully mulling things over!
    Run! Run! It's making reasonable, fact-based arguments!
    Quickly! Hide behind self-righteousness! The ad hominem
    rejoinders—ready the ad hominem rejoinders! Watch out! Dodge the issue
    at hand! Question its character and keep moving haphazardly from one
    flawed point to the next!
    All together now! Put every bit of secondhand conjecture into it you've got!
    Goddamn it, nothing's working! It's trapped us in our own
    unsubstantiated claims! We need to switch fundamentally unsound
    tactics. Hurry, throw up the straw man! Look, I think it's going for
    it. C'mon…c'mon…yes, it's going for it! Now hit it with the thing that
    one guy told us once while it's distracted by our ludicrous
    rationalizations!
    Gah! It's calmly and evenhandedly deflecting everything we're throwing
    at it. Our deductive fallacies are only making it stronger! Wait…what
    on earth is it doing now? Oh, no, it has sources! My God, it's
    defending itself with ironclad sources! Someone stop the citing!
    Please, please stop the citing!
    The language is impenetrable! For all that is good and holy, backpedal
    with all your might!
    Where are the children? Someone overprotect the children! They cannot
    be exposed to this kind of illuminative reasoning. Their young, open
    minds are much too vulnerable to independent thought. We have to
    shield them behind our unshakeable intolerance for critical thinking.
    What?!? Noooooooooo! Richard! For the love of God, it's convinced Richard!
    No time for tears now. Richard's mind has been changed forever. But we
    mustn't let it weaken our resolve. Mark my words, our ignorance will
    hold, no matter the cost. Now, more than ever, we have to keep
    floundering ahead with blind faith in our increasingly fallacious
    worldview.
    For Richard's sake.
    What's that? Now it's making an appeal to reason? Never! Do you hear
    me, you eloquent, well-read behemoth? Never! We'll die before we
    recognize what we secretly know to be true! The cognitive dissonance
    only makes our denial stronger!
    We have but one hope left: passive-aggressive slights disguised as
    impersonal discourse.† Okay, everyone, careful now…careful…if this is
    going to work, we have to arrogantly assume that it won't be smart
    enough to catch on to our attempt to salvage some feeling of
    superiority and—oh, God, it's calling us out! Quick, avoid eye contact
    and stammer an apology! Tell it we were just joking! Tell it we were
    joking!
    Arrgh! Our pride! Oh, Lord, our pride! It burns!
    All is lost. We don't stand a chance against its relentless onslaught
    of exhaustive research and immaculate rhetoric. We may as well lie
    down and—Christ, how it pains me to say it—admit that it's right. My
    friends, I would like to take these last few moments of stubborn
    close-mindedness to say that it's been an honor to dig myself into
    this hole with you.
    Unless…wait, of course! Why didn't we think of it before? Volume!
    Sheer volume! It's so simple. Quickly now, we don't have much time!
    Don't let it get a word in edgewise! Derisively cut it off
    mid-sentence! Now, launch the sophomoric personal attacks! Louder,
    yes, that's it, louder! Be repetitive, juvenile, and obstinate! It's
    working! It's working!
    We've done it! It's walking away and shaking its head in disgust!
    Huzzah! Finally—defeated with a single three-minute volley of
    irrelevant, off-topic shouting!
    Ironic, really, isn't it?
  • REALLY???
     
    No one thinks this is funny??
     
    Color me suprised....[&:]
  • Sorry hun....I just don't get it.  I might be a bit behind here but what the H double L does all that mean?  I read through the whole thing but each time I read it only got me more confused.  Reckon I'm just a bit lost is all.
  • When I got the email I didn't have the brain power to study this.  Since trainer, bless her heart, admitted she read it all the way through, I figured I better do at least THAT much!  It is very clever and it would be funny if I were sure which side of what argument they are slamming! [':)']
     
  • Ummm, ok.[:-]
     
    It is sarcasm,  someone who is being first person, describing someone that I know we have all argued- beg pardon, 'debated' with over the net.  Someone who prefers character assinations of the other person rather than stickin to the point, someone who pays no attention to facts or sources, and who makes infantile attacks when the other side makes a point they can't really argue with.
     
    And it don't matter whose SIDE its on, it is the close minded and infantile tendecies that are being described, and that can come from either 'side'........
     
    When I posted this on my myspace blog, I called it the 'biblography of a troll.'
  • OOOOHHHHHH!  Now it's in perspective for me.  (my brain is feeble)
     
    It can be applied to some politicians, and people who make arguments for stupid causes..... 
     
    You're a thinker DC!  You're a thinker. [':)']
  • Uh oh.  Now we're in for it....[':D']
     
    Shoot it!  Medicate it! Cage it!  Kill it!  Cut its tongue out, but shut it up!!  Its makin SENSE!!!